I have reverted your good-faith edit
Hi. When you recently edited Proto-Celtic language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conjugation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Beaver, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. — UncleBubba ( T @ C ) 12:01, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article Beaver has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. — UncleBubba ( T @ C ) 12:02, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Proto-Celtic language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brythonic language. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Celtic Mythology Contributions
Hello. I have been searching for the scholarship on the word Wirdjos. I noticed that you added information containing the term on a few of the Celtic pages. I was hoping you could help me by showing me to the sources you used for that information. Your edits were quite awhile ago and most of the associated links have gone dead in the meantime. Thank you for any help you can offer. Wirdjos (talk) 19:39, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)